Changed Perspectives and Conflicting Treaty Obligations
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Social Norms Versus Social Responsibility: Punishing Transgressions under Conflicting Obligations
Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Acknowledgments We thank Nicholas P. Lovrich and the Division of Government Studies and Services at Washington State University for the opportunity to work wit...
متن کاملConsent for organ donation--balancing conflicting ethical obligations.
n engl j med 358;12 www.nejm.org march 20, 2008 1209 the number of organs needed and the supply, clinicians have an ethical obligation to help ensure that the desires of people who want to donate organs are respected. The Department of Health and Human Services took up this challenge in 2003, when it collaborated with leading transplantation organizations to launch the Breakthrough Collaborativ...
متن کاملHistorical Analysis and Conflicting Perspectives - Contextualizing HCI
This paper develops two ways of analyzing the humancomputer interaction of a computer application in use in an organization. The techniques, historical analyses and conflicting perspectives analysis, and the interplay between them, are used in providing the basis for a more detailed analysis. Historical analyses focus on the historical development of artifacts and their use. Conflicting perspec...
متن کاملConflicting perspectives compromising discussions on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Healthcare professionals, patients and their relatives are expected to discuss resuscitation together. This study aims to identify the differences in the knowledge base and understanding of these parties. Questionnaires examining knowledge and opinion on resuscitation matters were completed during interviews of randomly selected doctors, nurses and the general public. 70% doctors, 24% nurses an...
متن کاملPatient and physician autonomy: conflicting rights and obligations in the physician-patient relationship.
In sum, beneficence and autonomy must be mutually re-enforcing if the patient's good is to be served, if the physician's ability to serve that good is not to be compromised, and if the physician's moral claim to autonomy and the integrity of the whole enterprise of medical ethics are to be respected.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Central European Journal of Comparative Law
سال: 2021
ISSN: 2732-1460,2732-0707
DOI: 10.47078/2021.1.53-82